Is the Criminal Justice System Bias Essay

AbstractThis study will bespeak several(prenominal) school principals and hopefully answer active of those questions. Questions wish well is the criminal proficientness ashes bias against the forgetful and is the criminal justness dodging bias against minorities. We thus(prenominal) explore some of the possible solutions to the line of works that could ca pulmonary tuberculosis biases. We then timber at a study by dint of with(p) on several communities where relations between justness of nature and the mankind had repaired their consanguinity.BodyIts easy to project why stack see the criminal justness constitution as biased. Our of any of our states pris mavinrs forty portion can not even read and 67 part did not thrust full-time manipulation when they were ar relaxation behaviored. So thither atomic number 18 more unlearned plenty in prison then there are educated people. This seems corresponding then that our schema of criminal referee is oper ated on an unequal system against unfortunate or uneducated people. However, one of the problems we stay into when we try to compare the wealthy law wearers to pitiable lawbreakers is the extensive difference between the amount of wealthy people and poor people we fix in our population. In 1989, the wealthiest one per centum of United States households owned around forty percent of the nations wealth. The wealthiest 20 percent owned more than eighty percent of the nations wealth. That leaves precious little for the rest (Cole, 2000). This isnt just true with adults, hardly with children and teenagers too.The enumerate of poor/under-funded schools in America faraway outweighs the effect of wealthy schools in America. Thats in altogether probability the primary(prenominal) tenableness our system appears to be unfair against the poor. The cerebrate that any pole or nation full re depend will be bias against the poor or lower discriminate is because there is a such(p renominal) larger poor/lower score population than a wealthy/high class population. nigh Americans will probably not want to remember that our criminal justice system is not operated on comparison. Afterall our nations Supreme Court even has the face adjoin Justice Under Law written above the entranceway. at that place are several very renowned Supreme Courts decisions that uphold equality for the poor. In Gideon v. Wainw right hand they made it a law that the state must provide a lawyer to all defendants who suffer been charged with a undecomposed offensive and cannot afford a lawyer. In Miranda v. genus Arizona the Supreme Court dogged that natural law must provide all suspects with an attorney.These court decisions might be a little mis hint since both were decided during the time of Chief Justice Earl Warren, who was strongly unspecific and very supportive of economic equality. Since then the principles of equality from both decisions for Gideon v. Wainwright a nd Miranda v. Arizona have been cheated and squirm so that neither decisions are upheld to the full termination that they were intended (Cole, 2000). Thats enough bashing our court system. There are actually many things that practice of law incumbents do witch can be biased. For example the quartern Amendment says that we have a right against unlawful searches and seizures. However, legal philosophy officers all the time and request their consent to search them or their belongings (without ever having any innovation for suspicion) without ever informing them of their right to refuse the search. This isnt inescapably a bias against the poor notwithstanding it makes sense to me that an officer would judge somebody on appearance.There is in any case the means of transportation we have to consider if law enforcement is bias to the poor. Say hypothetically some wealthy psyche is traveling cross shipway the kingdom to a birthday party. How are they spillage to travel? Most we althy people would probably travel across country like that by means of flying. firearm flying, people do not come in contact with that many natural law officers nor are they in many positions where they would normally break the law. However, say there is a poor person who is traveling the same distance to the same party hardly does not have the money to fly. The cheapest agency of transportation is unimpeachably by way of buss. While traveling by buss there is definitely a larger chance of contact with the law of nature than when traveling by air. There are excessively many more opportunities for criminal offense to be committed while traveling on a buss. again we have the situation where its not necessarily that the poor are treated otherwise but are maybe just in environments where crime is committed more often, which would explain why it seems that the system is biased against them (Rothwax, 1996)So I feel like we could come to an suitment now that the criminal justic e system is not necessarily biased against the poor at the law enforcement side of the criminal justice system. However, the courtroom side of the criminal justice system seems indirectly biased against the poor, simply because each test can be different depending on how more than money they defense and the prosecution have operational to them. Now lets talk rough other shipway that the criminal justice system could be bias. What about race? be people treated differently depending on their ethnicity? Most people probably agree that there are some ethnic groups who are treated differently than other ethnic groups in the criminal justice system. Statistically minorities are disproportionately victimised by crime.African Americans are victimized at a rate of 150 percent higher than whites (Cole, 2000). Blacks are typically more knobbed in al closely every kind of crime more so than whites. These crimes can include rape, modify assault, and armed robbery. Homicide is actually t he number one leading cause of death among young black men. Most crime is interracial and so it could be argued, just as it can with the topic of biases against the poor that the reason for higher crime rates for black is because most poverty stricken areas, or the inner city, have bulk black populations. Therefore the criminals would be black, the victims would be black, and all the statistics that came from that area would rate blacks more inclined to commit crime than whites. Now lets look at some cases. For instance the videotaped commoveing of Rodney King by Los Angeles legal philosophy Department officers was a huge eye-opener for most of America. It was said of that beating that for many blacks saw that as treatment they expected from the police. They were not surprised by that beating what so ever.Curtis Tucker, a California Assemblyman, was quoted saying at a subsequent hearing on Los Angeles legal philosophy Department practices, When black people in Los Angeles see a po lice motorcar approaching, they forefathert know whether justice will be meted out or whether judge, jury, and executioner is pulling up behind them. There was even this one officer who earned the nickname the Mechanic because he would lineage people up which apparently is police cod for beating up people. This Mechanic once testified that the beatings were widespread. When asked the question of weather he beat up people whom he arrested he replied, No. We just beat people up in general. If theyre on the street, hanging around drug locations. JustIt was a show of force (Rothwax,1996). The officer even admitted that the majority of the beating victims were either black or Hispanic although he claimed that the attacks were not motivated by racial tension. There have been very disturbing patterns of degeneracy and brutality in the police force of most every high-crime area studied.These corrupt acts include larceny from drug dealers, engaging in unlawful searches, seizures, and car stops, even dealing and using drugs. If instances like this is what our police force has come carry out to then our country is far worse off then I ever realized. I do however commit that this is probably a much low-spiriteder dower than what some statistics would lead us to believe but it is not a problem that I believe can be overlooked. So what can be done? Can something be done? Are we as a country so far bygone that we can come back? I believe we can. I believe that we have exit to far separate from the companionship. We have to bridge the go that has grown between law enforcement/the criminal justice system and the public lower class people. How do we do that? The thing we need most is eyeshot (Walker, 1980). One thing that could be the answer to our problem is corporation base policing. In Canada they passed the Police operate Act of 1990 that might be a steady-going reference for our current agencies to look back on. What the Police Services Act did was make the Chief of Police responsible for residential area-oriented policing (Kuck, 2004). alliance ground policing is both a philosophy and an organizational strategy that allows the police and alliance to work together in new ways to solve problems of crime, disorder and safety. It really only has both elements changing the methods and practice of the police and taking travel to establish a relationship between the police and the public (Groenewald, 2004). The Philosophy of union base policing is based off of the idea that the public has a right to give their input on policing. It also relies on the idea that to go through a solution for alliance problems both the police and the public must look past individual crimes and incidents, and instead try to find ways of confronting the more important community problems. What does community based policing look like though?Community based police officers need to be much more than mere crime fighters and must be public servants in many ways. make bettering the police alone, however, is not enough. Community support and assistance are also necessary. Community based policing therefore encompasses strategies to reorient the public who, forgood reasons, have been leery and distrustful of the police. edifice partnerships between the police and communities is a major repugn that not many people or organizations have every really attempted. The philosophy of community based policing asks both the police and the public to learn a leap of faith and a commitment to change. It would be a long process that would require forceful action to be taken at quintuple levels meaning that there would be detailed formulation necessary to turn philosophy into reality in spite of appearance the police and among the public.There was a study where Kuotsia gobbler Liou from the University of Central Florida and Eugene G. Savage from Florida State University looked at the fix of community policing by looking at collar neighborho ods in West Palm Beach, Florida before and later the implementation of a community oriented policing program. Lets take a look at what they found. They had 3 communities with the scratch consisting of mainly white residents, mainly single-family homes, apartments, and small businesses. The act community was primarily black consisting of a severe public housing project, single family homes, apartments, small businesses, several churches, and a public middle school. The last community consisted of whites, Hispanics, blacks, and Haitians. The community was made up of single family homes, apartments, small businesses, and several churches. It was their goal to find out how community policing affects difference types of communities.The results of their study showed that after the community based policing had been going on sixty-eight percent of surveyed citizens felt that crime had decreased. All age groups, race groups, and all three neighborhoods shared the belief that crime had decreased. as yet if the crime rates had not gone down in reality it would still really suffice relations with police officers just that the citizens believe it had. In addition to the feeling like crime had gone down they also asked in their survey how they felt about the relationship after six months of the community policing.Among the respondents to the survey eighty-eight percent felt that the relationship between the police and their communities as getting better. We started this paper with the question of is the criminal justice system bias. We talked about the relationship between law enforcement and the public. We talked about one of the possibilities of how we could rebuild that relationship. We then looked at some research where a relationship was made better by use of community policing.Hopefully we can use research like this to help make this demesne a more perfect world.Reference rapscallionCole, D. (2000). No equal justice, race and class in the american criminal justice system. hot York New Press, The.Rothwax, H. (1996). Guilty The collapse of criminal justice. New York ergodic House.Walker, S. (1980). Popular justice. New York Oxford University Press.Kuck, H. (2004). Racial pride and understanding trilogy Addressing hate crime and racial discord through community policing. Canadian Journal of Police and warranter Services. Dec. 2004 243. Criminal Justice Collection. Web. 29 Oct. 2012.Groenewald, H. and Peake, G. (2004). Police Reform through Community-Based Policing. New York.Liou, Kuotsai. and Savage, Eugene. (1996). Citizen perception of community policing impact.